Harry (2002) Collins vs Dimitri Bagaric — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
H. Collins	6	6	2
D. Bagaric	3	1	0

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Melbourne Men 01

H. Collins

L E. Vasiliadis 0–2 W C. Zhao 2–0 W S. Simmonds 2–1

D. Bagaric

W S. Simmonds 2–0 W C. Gaal 1–0

H. Collins · match stats · D. Bagaric

2Aces0

3Double faults1

72%First serve in57%

81%First-serve points won47%

75%Second serve in96%

50%Second-serve points won43%

50%Break points saved44%

56%Break points converted50%

55%Return points won28%

31Service points won24

29Receiver points won11

60Total points won35

12Games won4

7Service games won3

0Tiebreaks won0

13Longest point streak5

4Longest game streak2

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	1–0	2–1
Set 2	1–0	1–0

Figures read H. Collins first.

Set 27 games · newest first

6-1 game 7 H. Collins serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

5-1 game 6 D. Bagaric serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

4-1 game 5 H. Collins serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30

3-1 game 4 D. Bagaric serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

3-0 game 3 H. Collins serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

2-0 game 2 D. Bagaric serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

1-0 game 1 H. Collins serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30

Set 19 games · newest first

6-3 game 9 D. Bagaric serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

5-3 game 8 H. Collins serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A

5-2 game 7 D. Bagaric serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40 30-40 40-40 40-A

5-1 game 6 H. Collins serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

4-1 game 5 D. Bagaric serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

3-1 game 4 H. Collins serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

2-1 game 3 D. Bagaric serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A

2-0 game 2 H. Collins serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-0 game 1 D. Bagaric serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

Point chips read H. Collins first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

H. CollinsD. Bagaric

44%

56%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form

How the model did

Predicted D. Bagaric — wrong · final 2–0 (16 games)