← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Klec | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| S. van Weldam | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ I. Klec
▼ S. van Weldam
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Phan Thiet Men +H 01
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
K-Town Resort - Court 11
City
Phan Thiet
First serve
S. van Weldam
Total games
5–12
Recent form
S. van Weldam
L N. Thurner 0–2I. Klec · match stats · S. van Weldam
0Aces0
1Double faults4
69%First serve in63%
57%First-serve points won96%
94%Second serve in75%
47%Second-serve points won63%
25%Break points saved%
%Break points converted75%
16%Return points won46%
29Service points won36
7Receiver points won25
36Total points won61
5Games won12
5Service games won9
0Tiebreaks won0
3Longest point streak7
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 0–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–2 |
Figures read I. Klec first.
Set 28 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
S. van Weldam serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
I. Klec serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-4
game 6
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-3
game 5
I. Klec serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-3
game 4
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-2
game 3
I. Klec serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
0-2
game 2
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-1
game 1
I. Klec serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 19 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-5
game 8
I. Klec serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
3-4
game 7
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
3-3
game 6
I. Klec serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
2-3
game 5
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
2-2
game 4
I. Klec serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-2
game 3
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
I. Klec serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-1
game 1
S. van Weldam serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
Point chips read I. Klec first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
I. KlecS. van Weldam
56%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted I. Klec
— wrong
· final 0–2 (17 games)