Jose Garcia vs Piotr Gradzki — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
J. Garcia	6	6	2
P. Gradzki	4	1	0

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Knoxville Men 05

J. Garcia

W F. Roussel 2–0 W N. Pitts 2–0

P. Gradzki

L N. Pitts 1–2 L F. Roussel 0–2

J. Garcia · match stats · P. Gradzki

5Aces2

0Double faults1

57%First serve in52%

88%First-serve points won54%

100%Second serve in96%

55%Second-serve points won46%

0%Break points saved43%

57%Break points converted100%

50%Return points won26%

34Service points won27

27Receiver points won12

61Total points won39

12Games won5

8Service games won4

0Tiebreaks won0

8Longest point streak4

5Longest game streak2

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	2–0	0–1
Set 2	3–2	0–0

Figures read J. Garcia first.

Set 27 games · newest first

6-1 game 7 J. Garcia serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 A-40

5-1 game 6 P. Gradzki serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30

4-1 game 5 J. Garcia serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15

3-1 game 4 P. Gradzki serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40 30-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40

2-1 game 3 J. Garcia serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-1 game 2 P. Gradzki serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

1-0 game 1 J. Garcia serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30

Set 110 games · newest first

6-4 game 10 P. Gradzki serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

5-4 game 9 J. Garcia serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

4-4 game 8 P. Gradzki serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40

4-3 game 7 J. Garcia serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15

3-3 game 6 P. Gradzki serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40

3-2 game 5 J. Garcia serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

2-2 game 4 P. Gradzki serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40

2-1 game 3 J. Garcia serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

2-0 game 2 P. Gradzki serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-0 game 1 J. Garcia serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

Point chips read J. Garcia first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

J. GarciaP. Gradzki

78%

22%

78%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

More effective serve
Better recent form
Better on break points

How the model did

Predicted J. Garcia — correct · final 2–0 (17 games)