Connor Robb-Wilcox vs Felix Roussel — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
C. Robb-Wilcox	1	2	0
F. Roussel	6	6	2

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Knoxville Men 05

C. Robb-Wilcox

L E. Clark 0–2 W H. Jacques 2–1 W J. Weber 2–0

F. Roussel

W N. Pitts 2–0 L J. Garcia 0–2 W P. Gradzki 2–0

C. Robb-Wilcox · match stats · F. Roussel

2Aces4

0Double faults2

51%First serve in57%

50%First-serve points won66%

100%Second serve in92%

33%Second-serve points won50%

17%Break points saved86%

14%Break points converted83%

41%Return points won58%

18Service points won36

24Receiver points won25

42Total points won61

3Games won12

2Service games won7

0Tiebreaks won0

4Longest point streak5

1Longest game streak6

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–2	0–0
Set 2	2–2	0–2

Figures read C. Robb-Wilcox first.

Set 28 games · newest first

2-6 game 8 F. Roussel serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

2-5 game 7 C. Robb-Wilcox serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 30-40

2-4 game 6 F. Roussel serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

2-3 game 5 C. Robb-Wilcox serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 40-30

1-3 game 4 F. Roussel serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

1-2 game 3 C. Robb-Wilcox serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A

1-1 game 2 F. Roussel serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

0-1 game 1 C. Robb-Wilcox serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

Set 17 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 F. Roussel serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

1-5 game 6 C. Robb-Wilcox serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

1-4 game 5 F. Roussel serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

1-3 game 4 C. Robb-Wilcox serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40

1-2 game 3 F. Roussel serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-1 game 2 C. Robb-Wilcox serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

0-1 game 1 F. Roussel serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A

Point chips read C. Robb-Wilcox first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

C. Robb-WilcoxF. Roussel

65%

35%

65%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Slight statistical edge