← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Cham | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| N. Baker | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Melbourne Men 02
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Hume Tennis and Community Centre - Court 11
City
Craigieburn
First serve
E. Cham
Total games
12–8
E. Cham · match stats · N. Baker
2Aces1
2Double faults0
46%First serve in63%
73%First-serve points won67%
94%Second serve in100%
61%Second-serve points won56%
0%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted100%
38%Return points won33%
38Service points won30
18Receiver points won19
56Total points won49
12Games won8
9Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
6Longest point streak8
3Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–1 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 1–0 | 1–0 |
Figures read E. Cham first.
Set 210 games · newest first
6-4
game 10
E. Cham serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
5-4
game 9
N. Baker serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
5-3
game 8
E. Cham serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
4-3
game 7
N. Baker serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-3
game 6
E. Cham serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-3
game 5
N. Baker serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-2
game 4
E. Cham serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-2
game 3
N. Baker serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-1
game 2
E. Cham serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
0-1
game 1
N. Baker serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 110 games · newest first
6-4
game 10
E. Cham serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
5-4
game 9
N. Baker serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
5-3
game 8
E. Cham serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-3
game 7
N. Baker serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
4-2
game 6
E. Cham serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
3-2
game 5
N. Baker serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
3-1
game 4
E. Cham serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-0
game 3
N. Baker serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-0
game 2
E. Cham serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-0
game 1
N. Baker serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read E. Cham first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
E. ChamN. Baker
51%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Very evenly matched