Sophia Holod vs Emerson (USA) Jones — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
S. Holod	6	6	2
E. (. Jones	2	2	0

Momentum — game by game, ● = break

▲ S. Holod ▼ E. (. Jones

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT South Bend Women 01

S. Holod

W J. Ionescu 2–0

E. (. Jones

S. Holod · match stats · E. (. Jones

5Aces1

5Double faults6

55%First serve in50%

85%First-serve points won70%

76%Second serve in82%

62%Second-serve points won30%

100%Break points saved60%

40%Break points converted0%

50%Return points won26%

35Service points won33

33Receiver points won12

68Total points won45

12Games won4

8Service games won4

0Tiebreaks won0

8Longest point streak5

5Longest game streak1

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	2–0	2–2
Set 2	3–1	3–4

Figures read S. Holod first.

Set 28 games · newest first

6-2 game 8 S. Holod serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15

5-2 game 7 E. (. Jones serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

5-1 game 6 S. Holod serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

4-1 game 5 E. (. Jones serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

3-1 game 4 S. Holod serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40

2-1 game 3 E. (. Jones serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

1-1 game 2 S. Holod serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

0-1 game 1 E. (. Jones serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A

Set 18 games · newest first

6-2 game 8 S. Holod serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15

5-2 game 7 E. (. Jones serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30

4-2 game 6 S. Holod serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15

3-2 game 5 E. (. Jones serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

3-1 game 4 S. Holod serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

2-1 game 3 E. (. Jones serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15 40-30

1-1 game 2 S. Holod serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 40-30

0-1 game 1 E. (. Jones serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A

Point chips read S. Holod first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

S. HolodE. (. Jones

52%

48%

52%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Very evenly matched