← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. Herbert | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| N. Budkov Kjaer | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ P. Herbert
▼ N. Budkov Kjaer
Match facts
Tournament
Australian Open
Category
Grandslam
Round
Qualification Final
Surface
hard
Court
Court 5
City
Melbourne
First serve
N. Budkov Kjaer
Total games
5–12
Recent form
P. Herbert · match stats · N. Budkov Kjaer
9Aces5
3Double faults1
63%First serve in70%
70%First-serve points won85%
83%Second serve in93%
39%Second-serve points won64%
50%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted50%
21%Return points won42%
28Service points won37
10Receiver points won20
38Total points won57
5Games won12
5Service games won9
0Tiebreaks won0
6Longest point streak7
1Longest game streak3
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 5–2 | 2–0 |
| Set 2 | 4–3 | 1–1 |
Figures read P. Herbert first.
Set 29 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
3-5
game 8
P. Herbert serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-4
game 7
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-3
game 6
P. Herbert serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
2-3
game 5
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-2
game 4
P. Herbert serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-2
game 3
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-1
game 2
P. Herbert serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 18 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
P. Herbert serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
2-5
game 7
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
P. Herbert serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
1-4
game 5
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
P. Herbert serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-3
game 3
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-2
game 2
P. Herbert serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
N. Budkov Kjaer serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
Point chips read P. Herbert first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
P. HerbertN. Budkov Kjaer
59%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Dominant on this surface (71% win rate)
- More titles on this surface
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted N. Budkov Kjaer
— correct
P. Herbert
2.63
consensus price, since opening
N. Budkov Kjaer
1.44
consensus price, since opening
Match winnerdecimal
Bookmaker
P. Herbert
N. Budkov Kjaer
Gamdom
2.65
1.48
Consensus
2.63
1.44