← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Dikkenberg | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| E. Aguiard | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ E. Dikkenberg
▼ E. Aguiard
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Gold Coast Men 02
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Queens Park - Court 7
City
Southport
First serve
E. Dikkenberg
Total games
3–12
Recent form
E. Dikkenberg · match stats · E. Aguiard
1Aces4
2Double faults1
61%First serve in55%
45%First-serve points won65%
90%Second serve in95%
25%Second-serve points won53%
30%Break points saved33%
67%Break points converted70%
40%Return points won63%
19Service points won25
17Receiver points won32
36Total points won57
3Games won12
1Service games won5
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak6
1Longest game streak6
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–1 | 0–0 |
| Set 2 | 1–3 | 2–1 |
Figures read E. Dikkenberg first.
Set 28 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
2-5
game 7
E. Aguiard serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-5
game 6
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-4
game 5
E. Aguiard serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
1-3
game 4
E. Dikkenberg serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-3
game 3
E. Aguiard serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-2
game 2
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
E. Aguiard serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 17 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-5
game 6
E. Aguiard serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-4
game 5
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-3
game 4
E. Aguiard serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-3
game 3
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
E. Aguiard serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
0-1
game 1
E. Dikkenberg serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
Point chips read E. Dikkenberg first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
E. DikkenbergE. Aguiard
83%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form