Zachary Adam-Gedge vs Daniel Howard — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
Z. Adam-Gedge	6	6	2
D. Howard	3	0	0

Momentum — game by game, ● = break

▲ Z. Adam-Gedge ▼ D. Howard

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Gold Coast Men 02

Z. Adam-Gedge

L M. Perchicot 0–2 W Z. Talic 2–1 L S. Ziegann 0–2 W P. Navin 2–0 W T. E. Papac 2–1

D. Howard

Z. Adam-Gedge · match stats · D. Howard

4Aces0

2Double faults10

65%First serve in42%

73%First-serve points won50%

86%Second serve in64%

57%Second-serve points won25%

67%Break points saved45%

55%Break points converted33%

65%Return points won33%

27Service points won17

31Receiver points won13

58Total points won30

12Games won3

6Service games won2

0Tiebreaks won0

10Longest point streak4

8Longest game streak2

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–0	0–6
Set 2	4–0	2–4

Figures read Z. Adam-Gedge first.

Set 26 games · newest first

6-0 game 6 D. Howard serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15

5-0 game 5 Z. Adam-Gedge serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

4-0 game 4 D. Howard serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

3-0 game 3 Z. Adam-Gedge serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

2-0 game 2 D. Howard serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-0 game 1 Z. Adam-Gedge serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15

Set 19 games · newest first

6-3 game 9 D. Howard serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15 40-30 40-40 A-40

5-3 game 8 Z. Adam-Gedge serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 40-30

4-3 game 7 D. Howard serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

4-2 game 6 Z. Adam-Gedge serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

3-2 game 5 D. Howard serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15

2-2 game 4 Z. Adam-Gedge serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

1-2 game 3 D. Howard serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A

1-1 game 2 Z. Adam-Gedge serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-0 game 1 D. Howard serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

Point chips read Z. Adam-Gedge first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

Z. Adam-GedgeD. Howard

60%

40%

60%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Slight statistical edge