← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Timofeeva | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| S. Lamens | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ M. Timofeeva
▼ S. Lamens
Match facts
Tournament
Indian Wells
Category
Wta1000
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
hard
Court
Stadium 7
City
Indian Wells
First serve
S. Lamens
Total games
12–4
Recent form
M. Timofeeva · match stats · S. Lamens
2Aces2
1Double faults8
63%First serve in63%
61%First-serve points won50%
94%Second serve in62%
61%Second-serve points won19%
33%Break points saved50%
50%Break points converted67%
61%Return points won39%
30Service points won22
33Receiver points won19
63Total points won41
12Games won4
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak3
4Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–1 | 0–3 |
| Set 2 | 1–1 | 1–5 |
Figures read M. Timofeeva first.
Set 28 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
S. Lamens serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
5-2
game 7
M. Timofeeva serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
4-2
game 6
S. Lamens serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
3-2
game 5
M. Timofeeva serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
2-2
game 4
S. Lamens serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
2-1
game 3
M. Timofeeva serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-1
game 2
S. Lamens serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-1
game 1
M. Timofeeva serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
Set 18 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
S. Lamens serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
5-2
game 7
M. Timofeeva serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
5-1
game 6
S. Lamens serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
4-1
game 5
M. Timofeeva serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
3-1
game 4
S. Lamens serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
3-0
game 3
M. Timofeeva serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
2-0
game 2
S. Lamens serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-0
game 1
M. Timofeeva serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
Point chips read M. Timofeeva first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. TimofeevaS. Lamens
80%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better ranking (+50 places)
- Dominant on this surface (50% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted S. Lamens
— wrong
M. Timofeeva
2.10
consensus price, since opening
S. Lamens
1.67
consensus price, since opening
Match winnerdecimal
Bookmaker
M. Timofeeva
S. Lamens
Gamdom
1.92
1.93
Consensus
2.10
1.67