← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| J. Terziyska | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| N. Sevald | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ J. Terziyska
▼ N. Sevald
Match facts
Tournament
UTR Gyor W01
Category
Utr
Round
Semifinals
Surface
hard
Court
Gyor Olympic Sport Park (IN) - Court 03
City
Gyor
First serve
N. Sevald
Total games
12–3
Recent form
J. Terziyska · match stats · N. Sevald
2Aces0
2Double faults1
67%First serve in63%
81%First-serve points won48%
89%Second serve in93%
28%Second-serve points won13%
86%Break points saved14%
86%Break points converted14%
65%Return points won37%
34Service points won14
26Receiver points won20
60Total points won34
12Games won3
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
8Longest point streak4
4Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 2–0 | 1–1 |
Figures read J. Terziyska first.
Set 27 games · newest first
6-1
game 7
N. Sevald serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
5-1
game 6
J. Terziyska serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-1
game 5
N. Sevald serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-1
game 4
J. Terziyska serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
2-1
game 3
N. Sevald serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-0
game 2
J. Terziyska serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-0
game 1
N. Sevald serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Set 18 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
J. Terziyska serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
5-2
game 7
N. Sevald serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-2
game 6
J. Terziyska serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
4-1
game 5
N. Sevald serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-0
game 4
J. Terziyska serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-0
game 3
N. Sevald serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
2-0
game 2
J. Terziyska serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-0
game 1
N. Sevald serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read J. Terziyska first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
J. TerziyskaN. Sevald
72%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form