Lily Revak vs Veronica Miroshnichenko — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
L. Revak	2	1	0
V. Miroshnichenko	6	6	2

Match facts

Tournament

UTR Newport Beach W08

L. Revak

L S. Colling 1–2 L A. Rogin 0–2

V. Miroshnichenko

W S. Colling 2–0 W L. Oved 2–0 L A. Shcherbinina 0–2 W M. Aytoyan 2–0 W D. Suvirdjonkova 2–0

L. Revak · match stats · V. Miroshnichenko

0Aces2

1Double faults5

68%First serve in52%

35%First-serve points won67%

92%Second serve in80%

42%Second-serve points won56%

17%Break points saved80%

20%Break points converted83%

38%Return points won63%

14Service points won32

18Receiver points won24

32Total points won56

3Games won12

2Service games won7

0Tiebreaks won0

4Longest point streak10

2Longest game streak9

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–2	0–2
Set 2	0–0	1–2

Figures read L. Revak first.

Set 27 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 V. Miroshnichenko serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

1-5 game 6 L. Revak serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

0-5 game 5 V. Miroshnichenko serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40

0-4 game 4 L. Revak serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

0-3 game 3 V. Miroshnichenko serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-2 game 2 L. Revak serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

0-1 game 1 V. Miroshnichenko serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

Set 18 games · newest first

2-6 game 8 L. Revak serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40

2-5 game 7 V. Miroshnichenko serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

2-4 game 6 L. Revak serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

2-3 game 5 V. Miroshnichenko serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

2-2 game 4 L. Revak serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

1-2 game 3 V. Miroshnichenko serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

0-2 game 2 L. Revak serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

0-1 game 1 V. Miroshnichenko serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40

Point chips read L. Revak first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

L. RevakV. Miroshnichenko

47%

53%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form