Elijah Dikkenberg vs Aryan Karnani — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
E. Dikkenberg	2	0	0
A. Karnani	6	6	2

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Melbourne Men 03

E. Dikkenberg

L E. Vasiliadis 0–2 L S. Jones 0–2 L Z. Adam-Gedge 0–2 W D. Howard 2–0 L E. Aguiard 0–2

A. Karnani

L S. Jones 0–2 W E. Vasiliadis 2–0 W J. Staley 1–0 L R. Eldin 0–2 L H. Roberts 0–2

E. Dikkenberg · match stats · A. Karnani

0Aces1

4Double faults0

67%First serve in67%

44%First-serve points won68%

75%Second serve in100%

31%Second-serve points won53%

25%Break points saved80%

20%Break points converted75%

37%Return points won60%

19Service points won32

19Receiver points won29

38Total points won61

2Games won12

1Service games won6

0Tiebreaks won0

3Longest point streak8

2Longest game streak12

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–0	2–0
Set 2	0–1	2–0

Figures read E. Dikkenberg first.

Set 26 games · newest first

0-6 game 6 A. Karnani serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

0-5 game 5 E. Dikkenberg serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

0-4 game 4 A. Karnani serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A

0-3 game 3 E. Dikkenberg serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

0-2 game 2 A. Karnani serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-1 game 1 E. Dikkenberg serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

Set 18 games · newest first

2-6 game 8 A. Karnani serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

2-5 game 7 E. Dikkenberg serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40 40-40 40-A

2-4 game 6 A. Karnani serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

2-3 game 5 E. Dikkenberg serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

2-2 game 4 A. Karnani serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

2-1 game 3 E. Dikkenberg serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

2-0 game 2 A. Karnani serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40

1-0 game 1 E. Dikkenberg serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15

Point chips read E. Dikkenberg first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

E. DikkenbergA. Karnani

44%

56%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form