← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Zelley | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| M. Haagensen | 4 | 1 | 0 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ A. Zelley
▼ M. Haagensen
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Stirling Women 02
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Stirling University - Court 04
City
Stirling
First serve
M. Haagensen
Total games
12–5
Recent form
A. Zelley
A. Zelley · match stats · M. Haagensen
5Aces0
2Double faults2
54%First serve in61%
86%First-serve points won65%
89%Second serve in90%
74%Second-serve points won20%
%Break points saved43%
57%Break points converted%
53%Return points won20%
33Service points won24
27Receiver points won8
60Total points won32
12Games won5
8Service games won5
0Tiebreaks won0
19Longest point streak5
6Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–0 | 2–1 |
| Set 2 | 4–0 | 0–1 |
Figures read A. Zelley first.
Set 27 games · newest first
6-1
game 7
M. Haagensen serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
5-1
game 6
A. Zelley serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-1
game 5
M. Haagensen serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-1
game 4
A. Zelley serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-1
game 3
M. Haagensen serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-1
game 2
A. Zelley serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-1
game 1
M. Haagensen serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
Set 110 games · newest first
6-4
game 10
A. Zelley serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
5-4
game 9
M. Haagensen serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
5-3
game 8
A. Zelley serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
4-3
game 7
M. Haagensen serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
4-2
game 6
A. Zelley serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-2
game 5
M. Haagensen serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
3-1
game 4
A. Zelley serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
2-1
game 3
M. Haagensen serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-0
game 2
A. Zelley serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-0
game 1
M. Haagensen serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
Point chips read A. Zelley first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
A. ZelleyM. Haagensen
55%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form