Alina Kornieieva vs Polina Kuharenko — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
A. Kornieieva	1	1	0
P. Kuharenko	6	6	2

Momentum — game by game, ● = break

▲ A. Kornieieva ▼ P. Kuharenko

Match facts

Tournament

UTR Ahaus W01

A. Kornieieva

L A. Lazar 0–2 L V. Sandberg 0–2 L F. Steveker 0–2

P. Kuharenko

L F. Steveker 0–2 W V. Sandberg 2–0 W D. Marcinkēviča 2–0 W S. Olff 2–0 W V. Gudelj 2–0

A. Kornieieva · match stats · P. Kuharenko

0Aces1

3Double faults3

61%First serve in63%

27%First-serve points won55%

79%Second serve in83%

7%Second-serve points won67%

13%Break points saved67%

33%Break points converted88%

41%Return points won81%

7Service points won29

20Receiver points won29

27Total points won58

3Games won12

0Service games won5

0Tiebreaks won0

5Longest point streak13

2Longest game streak7

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–0	3–2
Set 2	0–1	0–1

Figures read A. Kornieieva first.

Set 27 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

1-5 game 6 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

1-4 game 5 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

1-3 game 4 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40

1-2 game 3 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

1-1 game 2 P. Kuharenko serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 30-15 30-30 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40

0-1 game 1 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40 30-40

Set 17 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 P. Kuharenko serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

1-5 game 6 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-4 game 5 P. Kuharenko serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

1-3 game 4 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-2 game 3 P. Kuharenko serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

1-1 game 2 A. Kornieieva serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40

1-0 game 1 P. Kuharenko serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30

Point chips read A. Kornieieva first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

A. KornieievaP. Kuharenko

44%

56%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form