Carolyn Schaefer vs Thea Latak — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
C. Schaefer	3	0	0
T. Latak	6	6	2

Momentum — game by game, ● = break

▲ C. Schaefer ▼ T. Latak

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Madison Women 01

C. Schaefer

L K. Schock 0–2 L M. Sholokhova 0–2 L K. Farrakhova 0–2 L S. Chennamsetty 0–2

T. Latak

C. Schaefer · match stats · T. Latak

1Aces5

5Double faults8

62%First serve in68%

48%First-serve points won79%

74%Second serve in60%

47%Second-serve points won35%

50%Break points saved100%

0%Break points converted50%

35%Return points won52%

24Service points won41

22Receiver points won26

46Total points won67

3Games won12

3Service games won8

0Tiebreaks won0

5Longest point streak6

1Longest game streak7

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	1–2	3–7
Set 2	0–3	2–1

Figures read C. Schaefer first.

Set 26 games · newest first

0-6 game 6 T. Latak serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-5 game 5 C. Schaefer serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 30-40

0-4 game 4 T. Latak serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

0-3 game 3 C. Schaefer serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-2 game 2 T. Latak serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

0-1 game 1 C. Schaefer serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A

Set 19 games · newest first

3-6 game 9 T. Latak serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

3-5 game 8 C. Schaefer serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

2-5 game 7 T. Latak serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A

2-4 game 6 C. Schaefer serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 40-30 40-40 40-A

2-3 game 5 T. Latak serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15 40-30 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

2-2 game 4 C. Schaefer serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40

1-2 game 3 T. Latak serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40

1-1 game 2 C. Schaefer serving

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15

0-1 game 1 T. Latak serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

Point chips read C. Schaefer first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

C. SchaeferT. Latak

45%

55%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form