← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| R. Inaba | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| J. Namigata | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ R. Inaba
▼ J. Namigata
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Saitama Women 04
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Green Tennis Plaza - Court 04
City
Kawaguchi
First serve
R. Inaba
Total games
2–12
Recent form
R. Inaba · match stats · J. Namigata
0Aces2
7Double faults1
55%First serve in53%
61%First-serve points won80%
76%Second serve in94%
24%Second-serve points won72%
55%Break points saved%
%Break points converted45%
24%Return points won55%
29Service points won29
9Receiver points won36
38Total points won65
2Games won12
2Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
3Longest point streak9
1Longest game streak8
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–1 | 2–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 5–0 |
Figures read R. Inaba first.
Set 231 min · 6 games · newest first
0-6
game 6
R. Inaba serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
0-5
game 5
J. Namigata serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-4
game 4
R. Inaba serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
0-3
game 3
J. Namigata serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-2
game 2
R. Inaba serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-1
game 1
J. Namigata serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 150 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
R. Inaba serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
2-5
game 7
J. Namigata serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-4
game 6
R. Inaba serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-4
game 5
J. Namigata serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-3
game 4
R. Inaba serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
0-3
game 3
J. Namigata serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
R. Inaba serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
J. Namigata serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
Point chips read R. Inaba first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
R. InabaJ. Namigata
68%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Slight statistical edge