← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| N. Visker | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| R. Nijboer | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ N. Visker
▼ R. Nijboer
Match facts
Tournament
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 16
Surface
clay
Court
Centre Court
City
Bunschoten
First serve
N. Visker
Total games
5–12
Recent form
N. Visker · match stats · R. Nijboer
5Aces0
2Double faults3
64%First serve in48%
59%First-serve points won65%
89%Second serve in86%
33%Second-serve points won73%
29%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted71%
31%Return points won50%
25Service points won29
13Receiver points won25
38Total points won54
5Games won12
4Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak7
2Longest game streak4
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 2–0 | 0–1 |
| Set 2 | 3–0 | 2–2 |
Figures read N. Visker first.
Set 239 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
N. Visker serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
3-5
game 8
R. Nijboer serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-4
game 7
N. Visker serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-4
game 6
R. Nijboer serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
2-3
game 5
N. Visker serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-3
game 4
R. Nijboer serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-2
game 3
N. Visker serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
R. Nijboer serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-0
game 1
N. Visker serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
Set 133 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
R. Nijboer serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-5
game 7
N. Visker serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-4
game 6
R. Nijboer serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-3
game 5
N. Visker serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
2-2
game 4
R. Nijboer serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-2
game 3
N. Visker serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-2
game 2
R. Nijboer serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
N. Visker serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
Point chips read N. Visker first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
N. ViskerR. Nijboer
52%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- More effective serve
- Better recent form
- Better on break points