← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| V. Bervid | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| R. Saigo | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ V. Bervid
▼ R. Saigo
Match facts
Tournament
Prague
Category
Wta250
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
hard
Court
Court 1
City
Prague
First serve
R. Saigo
Total games
3–12
Recent form
V. Bervid · match stats · R. Saigo
1Aces0
3Double faults0
48%First serve in84%
68%First-serve points won76%
86%Second serve in100%
29%Second-serve points won43%
33%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted67%
29%Return points won53%
19Service points won32
13Receiver points won21
32Total points won53
3Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak7
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–0 | 2–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
Figures read V. Bervid first.
Set 2115 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
R. Saigo serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-5
game 7
V. Bervid serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-5
game 6
R. Saigo serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
1-4
game 5
V. Bervid serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-3
game 4
R. Saigo serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-2
game 3
V. Bervid serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-2
game 2
R. Saigo serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
V. Bervid serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 129 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
R. Saigo serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-5
game 6
V. Bervid serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-5
game 5
R. Saigo serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-4
game 4
V. Bervid serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
0-3
game 3
R. Saigo serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-2
game 2
V. Bervid serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
R. Saigo serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
Point chips read V. Bervid first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
V. BervidR. Saigo
79%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+182 places)
- Dominant on this surface (50% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points