← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Malygina | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| L. Zaar | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ E. Malygina
▼ L. Zaar
Match facts
Tournament
Hamburg
Category
Wta250
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
clay
Court
M2
City
Hamburg
First serve
E. Malygina
Total games
12–6
E. Malygina · match stats · L. Zaar
0Aces0
3Double faults2
55%First serve in82%
68%First-serve points won49%
87%Second serve in78%
39%Second-serve points won22%
25%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted75%
56%Return points won45%
28Service points won22
28Receiver points won23
56Total points won45
12Games won6
6Service games won3
0Tiebreaks won0
6Longest point streak6
6Longest game streak4
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 2–1 |
Figures read E. Malygina first.
Set 242 min · 10 games · newest first
5-4
game 10
E. Malygina serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
5-4
game 9
L. Zaar serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
4-4
game 8
E. Malygina serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-4
game 7
L. Zaar serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-4
game 6
E. Malygina serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
1-4
game 5
L. Zaar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-4
game 4
E. Malygina serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-3
game 3
L. Zaar serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
0-2
game 2
E. Malygina serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
L. Zaar serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
Set 133 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
E. Malygina serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
5-2
game 7
L. Zaar serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
5-1
game 6
E. Malygina serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
5-0
game 5
L. Zaar serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-0
game 4
E. Malygina serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
3-0
game 3
L. Zaar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
2-0
game 2
E. Malygina serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
1-0
game 1
L. Zaar serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read E. Malygina first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Head to head
Win probability
E. MalyginaL. Zaar
53%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better on break points