← All tennis
Emily Victoria Eigelsbach (WC)
Germany
Serving
Maria Carle (7)
Argentina
Serving
0–2
1-6 · 1-6
Final
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Eigelsbach | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| M. Carle | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Momentum — game by game, ● = break
▲ E. Eigelsbach
▼ M. Carle
Match facts
Tournament
Hamburg
Category
Wta250
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
clay
Court
Centre Court
City
Hamburg
First serve
M. Carle
Total games
2–12
Recent form
E. Eigelsbach
E. Eigelsbach · match stats · M. Carle
0Aces0
1Double faults2
63%First serve in71%
33%First-serve points won78%
94%Second serve in82%
39%Second-serve points won55%
45%Break points saved67%
33%Break points converted55%
29%Return points won65%
17Service points won27
11Receiver points won30
28Total points won57
2Games won12
1Service games won6
0Tiebreaks won0
3Longest point streak15
1Longest game streak8
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–1 |
Figures read E. Eigelsbach first.
Set 227 min · 7 games · newest first
1-5
game 7
M. Carle serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-5
game 6
E. Eigelsbach serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-4
game 5
M. Carle serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-3
game 4
E. Eigelsbach serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-3
game 3
M. Carle serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-2
game 2
E. Eigelsbach serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-1
game 1
M. Carle serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 133 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
E. Eigelsbach serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
1-5
game 6
M. Carle serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
1-4
game 5
E. Eigelsbach serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-3
game 4
M. Carle serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-2
game 3
E. Eigelsbach serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-1
game 2
M. Carle serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
E. Eigelsbach serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
Point chips read E. Eigelsbach first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
E. EigelsbachM. Carle
85%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+282 places)
- Dominant on this surface (56% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points