← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| R. Pascual Ferra | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| M. Imamura | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
Bloomfield Hills, USA
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 32
Surface
hard
Court
Court 3
City
Bloomfield Hills
First serve
M. Imamura
Total games
12–2
Recent form
R. Pascual Ferra · match stats · M. Imamura
1Aces0
1Double faults2
81%First serve in63%
74%First-serve points won47%
89%Second serve in89%
44%Second-serve points won37%
%Break points saved55%
45%Break points converted%
57%Return points won32%
32Service points won22
29Receiver points won14
61Total points won36
12Games won2
7Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak3
7Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 0–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
Figures read R. Pascual Ferra first.
Set 236 min · 7 games · newest first
5-1
game 7
R. Pascual Ferra serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
5-1
game 6
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
4-1
game 5
R. Pascual Ferra serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
3-1
game 4
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
2-1
game 3
R. Pascual Ferra serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-1
game 2
M. Imamura serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-0
game 1
R. Pascual Ferra serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
Set 132 min · 7 games · newest first
6-1
game 7
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
5-1
game 6
R. Pascual Ferra serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
4-1
game 5
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
3-1
game 4
R. Pascual Ferra serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-1
game 3
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
1-1
game 2
R. Pascual Ferra serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
0-1
game 1
M. Imamura serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
Point chips read R. Pascual Ferra first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
R. Pascual FerraM. Imamura
62%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better ranking (+82 places)
- Dominant on this surface (41% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points