← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Oak | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| L. Weir | 6 | 7 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Tallahassee Women 01
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
FSU Indoor Tennis Center - Court 3
City
Tallahassee
First serve
L. Weir
Total games
6–13
I. Oak · match stats · L. Weir
0Aces1
2Double faults3
69%First serve in67%
66%First-serve points won87%
88%Second serve in84%
50%Second-serve points won42%
0%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted100%
28%Return points won39%
31Service points won42
16Receiver points won20
47Total points won62
6Games won13
6Service games won10
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak7
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–1 | 1–3 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
Figures read I. Oak first.
Set 247 min · 12 games · newest first
5-6
game 12
L. Weir serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
5-6
game 11
I. Oak serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
5-5
game 10
L. Weir serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
5-4
game 9
I. Oak serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
4-4
game 8
L. Weir serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-3
game 7
I. Oak serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-3
game 6
L. Weir serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-2
game 5
I. Oak serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-2
game 4
L. Weir serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
2-1
game 3
I. Oak serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
1-1
game 2
L. Weir serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-0
game 1
I. Oak serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
Set 124 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
L. Weir serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-5
game 6
I. Oak serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-4
game 5
L. Weir serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
I. Oak serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-2
game 3
L. Weir serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-1
game 2
I. Oak serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
L. Weir serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
Point chips read I. Oak first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
I. OakL. Weir
53%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Very evenly matched