← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Vasa | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| M. Kasnikowski | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Tampere, Finland
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 16
Surface
clay
Court
Centre Court
City
Tampere
First serve
E. Vasa
Total games
5–12
Recent form
E. Vasa · match stats · M. Kasnikowski
3Aces2
4Double faults0
54%First serve in63%
59%First-serve points won80%
86%Second serve in100%
48%Second-serve points won80%
50%Break points saved%
%Break points converted50%
20%Return points won46%
34Service points won32
8Receiver points won27
42Total points won59
5Games won12
5Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
6Longest point streak8
1Longest game streak3
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 3–1 | 3–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 1–0 |
Figures read E. Vasa first.
Set 233 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
E. Vasa serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
2-5
game 7
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
E. Vasa serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
1-4
game 5
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
M. Kasnikowski serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-1
game 2
E. Vasa serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
Set 134 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-5
game 8
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-4
game 7
E. Vasa serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-4
game 6
M. Kasnikowski serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-3
game 5
E. Vasa serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-3
game 4
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-2
game 3
E. Vasa serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-1
game 2
M. Kasnikowski serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
E. Vasa serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
Point chips read E. Vasa first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
E. VasaM. Kasnikowski
57%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+239 places)