← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| H. Barton | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| T. Handel | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
Hamburg, Germany
Category
Challenger
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
clay
Court
M1
City
Hamburg
First serve
T. Handel
Total games
12–6
H. Barton · match stats · T. Handel
5Aces4
1Double faults0
72%First serve in70%
82%First-serve points won65%
92%Second serve in100%
69%Second-serve points won44%
%Break points saved63%
38%Break points converted%
42%Return points won21%
37Service points won31
22Receiver points won10
59Total points won41
12Games won6
9Service games won6
0Tiebreaks won0
12Longest point streak5
5Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 3–2 | 0–0 |
| Set 2 | 2–2 | 1–0 |
Figures read H. Barton first.
Set 231 min · 10 games · newest first
5-4
game 10
H. Barton serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
5-4
game 9
T. Handel serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
5-3
game 8
H. Barton serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
4-3
game 7
T. Handel serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
4-2
game 6
H. Barton serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-2
game 5
T. Handel serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
2-2
game 4
H. Barton serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-2
game 3
T. Handel serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-1
game 2
H. Barton serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-1
game 1
T. Handel serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
Set 126 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
H. Barton serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
5-2
game 7
T. Handel serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-2
game 6
H. Barton serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-2
game 5
T. Handel serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
2-2
game 4
H. Barton serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
1-2
game 3
T. Handel serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
1-1
game 2
H. Barton serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-1
game 1
T. Handel serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
Point chips read H. Barton first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Head to head
Win probability
H. BartonT. Handel
80%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+232 places)
- Dominant on this surface (56% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted H. Barton
— correct