← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| B. Arias | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| E. Kirkin | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Hamburg, Germany
Category
Challenger
Round
Qualification Round 1
Surface
clay
Court
M5
City
Hamburg
First serve
B. Arias
Total games
4–12
Recent form
B. Arias · match stats · E. Kirkin
0Aces7
3Double faults0
56%First serve in51%
56%First-serve points won84%
86%Second serve in100%
29%Second-serve points won72%
29%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted71%
22%Return points won56%
21Service points won29
7Receiver points won27
28Total points won56
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak7
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–3 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–3 | 2–0 |
Figures read B. Arias first.
Set 234 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
E. Kirkin serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
2-5
game 7
B. Arias serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-4
game 6
E. Kirkin serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-3
game 5
B. Arias serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-2
game 4
E. Kirkin serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-1
game 3
B. Arias serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
1-1
game 2
E. Kirkin serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-0
game 1
B. Arias serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
Set 128 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
E. Kirkin serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-5
game 7
B. Arias serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-4
game 6
E. Kirkin serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-4
game 5
B. Arias serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-3
game 4
E. Kirkin serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-2
game 3
B. Arias serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-1
game 2
E. Kirkin serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
B. Arias serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read B. Arias first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
B. AriasE. Kirkin
68%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Dominant on this surface (50% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better recent form
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted E. Kirkin
— correct