← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. Ruse | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| M. Linette | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
Cincinnati
Category
Wta1000
Round
Round of 128
Surface
hard
Court
Court 10
City
Cincinnati
First serve
M. Linette
Total games
12–3
Recent form
E. Ruse · match stats · M. Linette
1Aces3
5Double faults6
45%First serve in43%
74%First-serve points won59%
82%Second serve in79%
50%Second-serve points won28%
67%Break points saved25%
75%Break points converted33%
59%Return points won39%
31Service points won21
29Receiver points won20
60Total points won41
12Games won3
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak3
6Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–2 |
| Set 2 | 1–3 | 4–4 |
Figures read E. Ruse first.
Set 249 min · 9 games · newest first
5-3
game 9
M. Linette serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
5-3
game 8
E. Ruse serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
5-2
game 7
M. Linette serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
4-2
game 6
E. Ruse serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
3-2
game 5
M. Linette serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
3-1
game 4
E. Ruse serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-1
game 3
M. Linette serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-1
game 2
E. Ruse serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-1
game 1
M. Linette serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
Set 129 min · 6 games · newest first
6-0
game 6
E. Ruse serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
5-0
game 5
M. Linette serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-0
game 4
E. Ruse serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-0
game 3
M. Linette serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
2-0
game 2
E. Ruse serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-0
game 1
M. Linette serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read E. Ruse first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
E. RuseM. Linette
51%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted E. Ruse
— correct