Maria Tkalenko vs Julita Saner — score & stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
M. Tkalenko	1	2	0
J. Saner	6	6	2

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Arnhem Women 05

M. Tkalenko

L M. Ngounoue 0–2 L E. Scaldalai 1–2 L V. Van de Peer 0–2 W M. Pryshchepa 2–0 L F. Sprengers 0–2

J. Saner

W P. Abbas 2–0 W M. Shmakova 0–0 W S. Stula 2–0 W P. Abbas 2–1 W A. Pitta 2–0

M. Tkalenko · match stats · J. Saner

0Aces1

2Double faults1

52%First serve in74%

35%First-serve points won62%

90%Second serve in93%

43%Second-serve points won60%

50%Break points saved78%

22%Break points converted50%

39%Return points won61%

17Service points won35

22Receiver points won27

39Total points won62

3Games won12

1Service games won6

0Tiebreaks won0

8Longest point streak8

2Longest game streak9

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–0	1–1
Set 2	0–1	1–0

Figures read M. Tkalenko first.

Set 233 min · 8 games · newest first

2-5 game 8 J. Saner serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

2-5 game 7 M. Tkalenko serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 15-40 30-40

2-4 game 6 J. Saner serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

2-3 game 5 M. Tkalenko serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-3 game 4 J. Saner serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 40-15 40-30

0-3 game 3 M. Tkalenko serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

0-2 game 2 J. Saner serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

0-1 game 1 M. Tkalenko serving BREAK

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

Set 145 min · 7 games · newest first

1-6 game 7 J. Saner serving

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40

1-5 game 6 M. Tkalenko serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

1-4 game 5 J. Saner serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

1-3 game 4 M. Tkalenko serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40

1-2 game 3 J. Saner serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 40-A

1-1 game 2 M. Tkalenko serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15 40-30 40-40 40-A

1-0 game 1 J. Saner serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 0-40 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40

Point chips read M. Tkalenko first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

M. TkalenkoJ. Saner

36%

64%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Better recent form

How the model did

Predicted J. Saner — correct