← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. Johnstone | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| M. Horvit | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Glasgow Women 01
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Newlands Lawn Tennis Club - Court 02
City
Glasgow
First serve
S. Johnstone
Total games
4–12
Recent form
S. Johnstone · match stats · M. Horvit
0Aces4
6Double faults4
67%First serve in52%
50%First-serve points won83%
65%Second serve in81%
35%Second-serve points won52%
29%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted71%
32%Return points won55%
23Service points won30
14Receiver points won28
37Total points won58
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak8
2Longest game streak7
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–2 | 2–3 |
| Set 2 | 0–2 | 4–1 |
Figures read S. Johnstone first.
Set 230 min · 6 games · newest first
0-5
game 6
M. Horvit serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-5
game 5
S. Johnstone serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-4
game 4
M. Horvit serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-3
game 3
S. Johnstone serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
M. Horvit serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-1
game 1
S. Johnstone serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
Set 148 min · 10 games · newest first
4-6
game 10
M. Horvit serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
4-5
game 9
S. Johnstone serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-5
game 8
M. Horvit serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
3-4
game 7
S. Johnstone serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
3-3
game 6
M. Horvit serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
3-2
game 5
S. Johnstone serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
2-2
game 4
M. Horvit serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
1-2
game 3
S. Johnstone serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
M. Horvit serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
1-0
game 1
S. Johnstone serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
Point chips read S. Johnstone first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
S. JohnstoneM. Horvit
58%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Slight statistical edge
How the model did
Predicted M. Horvit
— correct