← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. Poling | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| P. Rickert | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Boise Women 01
Category
Utr
Round
Semifinals
Surface
hard
Court
Appleton Tennis Center - Court 4
City
Boise
First serve
P. Rickert
Total games
12–4
Recent form
L. Poling · match stats · P. Rickert
0Aces1
2Double faults3
53%First serve in44%
76%First-serve points won42%
91%Second serve in90%
50%Second-serve points won37%
60%Break points saved45%
55%Break points converted40%
61%Return points won36%
30Service points won21
33Receiver points won15
63Total points won36
12Games won4
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
14Longest point streak3
9Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–1 | 1–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–2 |
Figures read L. Poling first.
Set 234 min · 8 games · newest first
5-2
game 8
L. Poling serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
5-2
game 7
P. Rickert serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
5-1
game 6
L. Poling serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
5-0
game 5
P. Rickert serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
4-0
game 4
L. Poling serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-0
game 3
P. Rickert serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-0
game 2
L. Poling serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-0
game 1
P. Rickert serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
Set 139 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
L. Poling serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
5-2
game 7
P. Rickert serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
4-2
game 6
L. Poling serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
3-2
game 5
P. Rickert serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
2-2
game 4
L. Poling serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-1
game 3
P. Rickert serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-1
game 2
L. Poling serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
0-1
game 1
P. Rickert serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
Point chips read L. Poling first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
L. PolingP. Rickert
61%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted L. Poling
— correct