← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| H. G. Gomez | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| L. Sheyngezikht | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Skopje Men +H 04
Category
Utr
Surface
clay
Court
Tennis Club Jug - Court 06
City
Skopje
First serve
H. G. Gomez
Total games
4–12
Recent form
H. G. Gomez · match stats · L. Sheyngezikht
0Aces0
1Double faults5
76%First serve in55%
46%First-serve points won91%
92%Second serve in74%
75%Second-serve points won58%
33%Break points saved%
%Break points converted67%
24%Return points won47%
26Service points won32
10Receiver points won23
36Total points won55
4Games won12
4Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak8
1Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 0–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 1–3 |
Figures read H. G. Gomez first.
Set 238 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-5
game 7
H. G. Gomez serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
1-5
game 6
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-4
game 5
H. G. Gomez serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-3
game 4
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-2
game 3
H. G. Gomez serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-1
game 2
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
H. G. Gomez serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
Set 138 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
H. G. Gomez serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
2-4
game 6
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-3
game 5
H. G. Gomez serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-2
game 4
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
2-1
game 3
H. G. Gomez serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-1
game 2
L. Sheyngezikht serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-0
game 1
H. G. Gomez serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read H. G. Gomez first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
H. G. GomezL. Sheyngezikht
64%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted L. Sheyngezikht
— correct