← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| R. Gasanov | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| H. Seo | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Saitama Men 08
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Green Tennis Plaza - Court 07
City
Kawaguchi
First serve
H. Seo
Total games
4–12
Recent form
R. Gasanov · match stats · H. Seo
1Aces1
4Double faults3
58%First serve in47%
50%First-serve points won67%
82%Second serve in90%
36%Second-serve points won61%
17%Break points saved86%
14%Break points converted83%
36%Return points won56%
23Service points won37
21Receiver points won29
44Total points won66
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
4Longest point streak8
1Longest game streak4
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–0 | 2–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 2–3 |
Figures read R. Gasanov first.
Set 236 min · 7 games · newest first
1-5
game 7
R. Gasanov serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-5
game 6
H. Seo serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-4
game 5
R. Gasanov serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-3
game 4
H. Seo serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-3
game 3
R. Gasanov serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
0-2
game 2
H. Seo serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
R. Gasanov serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 158 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
H. Seo serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
3-5
game 8
R. Gasanov serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
2-5
game 7
H. Seo serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
2-4
game 6
R. Gasanov serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-4
game 5
H. Seo serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
R. Gasanov serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
H. Seo serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
1-1
game 2
R. Gasanov serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
0-1
game 1
H. Seo serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Point chips read R. Gasanov first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
R. GasanovH. Seo
52%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Very evenly matched
How the model did
Predicted R. Gasanov
— wrong