← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| K. Ozaki | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| K. H. Hung | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Saitama Men 08
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Green Tennis Plaza - Court 06
City
Kawaguchi
First serve
K. Ozaki
Total games
3–12
K. Ozaki · match stats · K. H. Hung
0Aces3
3Double faults1
53%First serve in56%
48%First-serve points won72%
89%Second serve in95%
41%Second-serve points won60%
44%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted56%
33%Return points won55%
26Service points won30
15Receiver points won32
41Total points won61
3Games won11
2Service games won6
0Tiebreaks won0
9Longest point streak9
2Longest game streak7
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–2 | 1–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 2–0 |
Figures read K. Ozaki first.
Set 238 min · 7 games · newest first
1-5
game 7
K. Ozaki serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
1-5
game 6
K. H. Hung serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
1-4
game 5
K. Ozaki serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-4
game 4
K. H. Hung serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-3
game 3
K. Ozaki serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
K. H. Hung serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-1
game 1
K. Ozaki serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
Set 154 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
K. H. Hung serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
2-5
game 7
K. Ozaki serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
2-4
game 6
K. H. Hung serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
2-3
game 5
K. Ozaki serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-3
game 4
K. H. Hung serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
0-3
game 3
K. Ozaki serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
K. H. Hung serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
K. Ozaki serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Point chips read K. Ozaki first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
K. OzakiK. H. Hung
61%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted K. Ozaki
— wrong