← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| J. Huh | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| M. Ekstrand | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Newport Beach Women 21
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Court 21
City
Newport Beach
First serve
M. Ekstrand
Total games
4–12
Recent form
J. Huh · match stats · M. Ekstrand
0Aces2
1Double faults4
43%First serve in51%
61%First-serve points won96%
97%Second serve in83%
30%Second-serve points won39%
38%Break points saved0%
100%Break points converted63%
32%Return points won57%
23Service points won32
15Receiver points won30
38Total points won62
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak9
1Longest game streak4
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–4 |
| Set 2 | 0–2 | 0–0 |
Figures read J. Huh first.
Set 242 min · 8 games · newest first
2-5
game 8
J. Huh serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
2-5
game 7
M. Ekstrand serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-4
game 6
J. Huh serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-4
game 5
M. Ekstrand serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
1-3
game 4
J. Huh serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-2
game 3
M. Ekstrand serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
0-2
game 2
J. Huh serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-1
game 1
M. Ekstrand serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
Set 138 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
J. Huh serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
2-5
game 7
M. Ekstrand serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
J. Huh serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-4
game 5
M. Ekstrand serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-3
game 4
J. Huh serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
0-3
game 3
M. Ekstrand serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-2
game 2
J. Huh serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
M. Ekstrand serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
Point chips read J. Huh first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
J. HuhM. Ekstrand
70%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted M. Ekstrand
— correct