← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Set 3 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Nakashima | 7 | 6 | 7 | 2 |
| A. Ilagan | 5 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
Match facts
Tournament
Tiburon, USA
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 32
Surface
hard
Court
Backer Mckenzie
City
Tiburon
First serve
B. Nakashima
Total games
20–18
Recent form
B. Nakashima · match stats · A. Ilagan
16Aces15
6Double faults5
60%First serve in68%
79%First-serve points won73%
88%Second serve in87%
48%Second-serve points won56%
80%Break points saved71%
29%Break points converted20%
32%Return points won33%
80Service points won82
38Receiver points won39
118Total points won121
20Games won18
17Service games won16
1Tiebreaks won1
6Longest point streak7
3Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 6–5 | 0–4 |
| Set 2 | 4–6 | 3–0 |
| Set 3 | 6–4 | 3–1 |
Figures read B. Nakashima first.
Set 355 min · 13 games · newest first
6-6
game 13
A. Ilagan serving
1-0
2-0
2-1
3-1
3-2
4-2
4-3
5-3
6-3
6-6
game 12
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
5-6
game 11
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
5-5
game 10
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-5
game 9
A. Ilagan serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-4
game 8
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
3-4
game 7
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
3-3
game 6
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
2-3
game 5
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
2-2
game 4
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
1-2
game 3
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
B. Nakashima serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
A. Ilagan serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
Set 253 min · 13 games · newest first
6-7
game 13
A. Ilagan serving
0-1
0-2
0-3
1-3
1-4
2-4
3-4
4-4
4-5
4-6
4-7
6-6
game 12
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
6-5
game 11
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
5-5
game 10
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
5-4
game 9
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
4-4
game 8
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
4-3
game 7
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
3-3
game 6
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
3-2
game 5
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
2-2
game 4
A. Ilagan serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-1
game 3
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
1-1
game 2
A. Ilagan serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
Set 151 min · 12 games · newest first
7-5
game 12
A. Ilagan serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
6-5
game 11
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
5-5
game 10
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
5-4
game 9
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
4-4
game 8
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
4-3
game 7
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-3
game 6
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-2
game 5
B. Nakashima serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-2
game 4
A. Ilagan serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
2-1
game 3
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-1
game 2
A. Ilagan serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-0
game 1
B. Nakashima serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
Point chips read B. Nakashima first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Head to head
Win probability
B. NakashimaA. Ilagan
76%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+319 places)
- Dominant on this surface (53% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted A. Ilagan
— wrong
B. Nakashima
2.20
consensus price, since opening
A. Ilagan
1.62
1.62
▲
consensus price, since opening
Match winnerdecimal
Bookmaker
B. Nakashima
A. Ilagan
Gamdom
2.43
1.56
Consensus
2.20
1.62