← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Deng | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| G. Arangio | 4 | 1 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Newport Beach Women 23
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Court 21
City
Newport Beach
First serve
G. Arangio
Total games
12–5
Recent form
M. Deng · match stats · G. Arangio
1Aces2
1Double faults1
64%First serve in69%
69%First-serve points won54%
94%Second serve in94%
63%Second-serve points won35%
67%Break points saved38%
63%Break points converted33%
52%Return points won33%
30Service points won26
28Receiver points won15
58Total points won41
12Games won5
7Service games won4
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak4
8Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–1 | 1–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 0–0 |
Figures read M. Deng first.
Set 237 min · 7 games · newest first
5-1
game 7
G. Arangio serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
5-1
game 6
M. Deng serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
5-0
game 5
G. Arangio serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
4-0
game 4
M. Deng serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
3-0
game 3
G. Arangio serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
2-0
game 2
M. Deng serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-0
game 1
G. Arangio serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
Set 151 min · 10 games · newest first
6-4
game 10
M. Deng serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
5-4
game 9
G. Arangio serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-4
game 8
M. Deng serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
3-4
game 7
G. Arangio serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
3-3
game 6
M. Deng serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
2-3
game 5
G. Arangio serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
2-2
game 4
M. Deng serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-2
game 3
G. Arangio serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-1
game 2
M. Deng serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-1
game 1
G. Arangio serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Point chips read M. Deng first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. DengG. Arangio
60%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Slight statistical edge
How the model did
Predicted G. Arangio
— wrong