Jahnie van Zyl vs Sofia Martinenghi Result & Stats

Set by set

Player	Set 1	Set 2	Sets
J. van Zyl	6	6	2
S. Martinenghi	3	2	0

Match facts

Tournament

UTR PTT Le Cap d Agde Women 01

J. van Zyl

L T. Russell 1–2

S. Martinenghi

L O. Molchanova 0–2 L J. Bornay 0–2 L A. Benaissa 1–2

J. van Zyl · match stats · S. Martinenghi

0Aces1

1Double faults3

57%First serve in68%

69%First-serve points won36%

95%Second serve in75%

64%Second-serve points won42%

50%Break points saved17%

83%Break points converted50%

62%Return points won33%

34Service points won14

23Receiver points won17

57Total points won31

12Games won5

7Service games won3

0Tiebreaks won0

9Longest point streak5

4Longest game streak1

Per set · aces & double faults

Set	Aces	Double faults
Set 1	0–1	0–1
Set 2	0–0	0–2

Figures read J. van Zyl first.

Set 228 min · 8 games · newest first

5-2 game 8 J. van Zyl serving

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

5-2 game 7 S. Martinenghi serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

4-2 game 6 J. van Zyl serving

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15

3-2 game 5 S. Martinenghi serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

2-2 game 4 J. van Zyl serving BREAK

15-0 15-15 30-15 30-30 30-40

2-1 game 3 S. Martinenghi serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-1 game 2 J. van Zyl serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

0-1 game 1 S. Martinenghi serving

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 30-40

Set 139 min · 9 games · newest first

6-3 game 9 J. van Zyl serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 30-30 40-30

5-3 game 8 S. Martinenghi serving

0-15 0-30 0-40

5-2 game 7 J. van Zyl serving

0-15 15-15 30-15 40-15

4-2 game 6 S. Martinenghi serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 30-15 40-15

3-2 game 5 J. van Zyl serving BREAK

0-15 0-30 15-30 30-30 30-40

3-1 game 4 S. Martinenghi serving BREAK

15-0 30-0 40-0 40-15

2-1 game 3 J. van Zyl serving

15-0 30-0 40-0

1-1 game 2 S. Martinenghi serving

0-15 15-15 15-30 15-40

1-0 game 1 J. van Zyl serving

15-0 15-15 15-30 15-40 30-40 40-40 A-40 40-40 A-40

Point chips read J. van Zyl first · highlighted border marks the point winner.

Win probability

J. van ZylS. Martinenghi

50%

Model confidence

Why the model thinks so

Very evenly matched

How the model did

Predicted J. van Zyl — correct