← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| R. Leal | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| J. de Jager | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Carvoeiro Men +H 07
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Carvoeiro Clube de Tenis - 05. Court FredGil
City
Carvoeiro
First serve
J. de Jager
Total games
4–12
Recent form
R. Leal
W M. Coman 2–0R. Leal · match stats · J. de Jager
0Aces1
2Double faults1
76%First serve in58%
46%First-serve points won62%
83%Second serve in95%
8%Second-serve points won48%
13%Break points saved57%
43%Break points converted88%
44%Return points won63%
19Service points won28
22Receiver points won32
41Total points won60
4Games won12
1Service games won5
0Tiebreaks won0
9Longest point streak7
3Longest game streak7
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–1 | 1–1 |
Figures read R. Leal first.
Set 240 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
R. Leal serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
3-5
game 8
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
3-4
game 7
R. Leal serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
3-3
game 6
J. de Jager serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
2-3
game 5
R. Leal serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-3
game 4
J. de Jager serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-3
game 3
R. Leal serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
0-2
game 2
J. de Jager serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
R. Leal serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 132 min · 7 games · newest first
1-6
game 7
J. de Jager serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-5
game 6
R. Leal serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-4
game 5
J. de Jager serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
1-3
game 4
R. Leal serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
J. de Jager serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-2
game 2
R. Leal serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
J. de Jager serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
Point chips read R. Leal first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
R. LealJ. de Jager
55%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted J. de Jager
— correct