← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| J. Šiftar | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| T. Paroulek | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Trnava Men 04
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
TC EMPIRE TRNAVA - Court 6
City
Trnava
First serve
J. Šiftar
Total games
4–12
Recent form
J. Šiftar · match stats · T. Paroulek
0Aces0
2Double faults1
62%First serve in66%
56%First-serve points won71%
90%Second serve in94%
30%Second-serve points won69%
38%Break points saved86%
14%Break points converted63%
30%Return points won54%
24Service points won33
14Receiver points won28
38Total points won61
4Games won12
3Service games won7
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak7
2Longest game streak5
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 2–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–0 |
Figures read J. Šiftar first.
Set 229 min · 7 games · newest first
1-5
game 7
T. Paroulek serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-5
game 6
J. Šiftar serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
1-4
game 5
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
J. Šiftar serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-1
game 2
J. Šiftar serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Set 143 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
J. Šiftar serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
3-5
game 8
T. Paroulek serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
3-4
game 7
J. Šiftar serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
3-3
game 6
T. Paroulek serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-3
game 5
J. Šiftar serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-3
game 4
T. Paroulek serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
1-2
game 3
J. Šiftar serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
0-2
game 2
T. Paroulek serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
J. Šiftar serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
Point chips read J. Šiftar first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
J. ŠiftarT. Paroulek
59%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Dominant on this surface (50% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted T. Paroulek
— correct