← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| P. Homola | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| I. Sabanov | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR Olomouc M04
Category
Utr
Surface
carpet
Court
Omega Sport - Court 01
City
Olomouc
First serve
I. Sabanov
Total games
12–4
Recent form
P. Homola · match stats · I. Sabanov
10Aces1
1Double faults3
67%First serve in69%
81%First-serve points won66%
94%Second serve in81%
56%Second-serve points won19%
100%Break points saved33%
67%Break points converted0%
49%Return points won27%
35Service points won26
25Receiver points won13
60Total points won39
12Games won4
8Service games won4
0Tiebreaks won0
9Longest point streak5
5Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 5–1 | 0–1 |
| Set 2 | 5–0 | 1–2 |
Figures read P. Homola first.
Set 234 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
P. Homola serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
5-2
game 7
I. Sabanov serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
5-1
game 6
P. Homola serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-1
game 5
I. Sabanov serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
3-1
game 4
P. Homola serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
2-1
game 3
I. Sabanov serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-0
game 2
P. Homola serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-0
game 1
I. Sabanov serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
Set 129 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
P. Homola serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
5-2
game 7
I. Sabanov serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
4-2
game 6
P. Homola serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
3-2
game 5
I. Sabanov serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
3-1
game 4
P. Homola serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
2-1
game 3
I. Sabanov serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-1
game 2
P. Homola serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
0-1
game 1
I. Sabanov serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
Point chips read P. Homola first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
P. HomolaI. Sabanov
54%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better recent form
How the model did
Predicted P. Homola
— correct