← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Z. Hammond | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| C. Chavarria | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Chapel Hill Women 01
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Chapel Hill - Indoor - Court 6
City
Chapel Hill
First serve
C. Chavarria
Total games
12–3
Recent form
Z. Hammond · match stats · C. Chavarria
0Aces0
1Double faults3
78%First serve in63%
69%First-serve points won44%
89%Second serve in81%
78%Second-serve points won19%
80%Break points saved25%
75%Break points converted20%
65%Return points won29%
29Service points won15
28Receiver points won12
57Total points won27
12Games won3
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
12Longest point streak3
6Longest game streak1
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–0 | 1–3 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–0 |
Figures read Z. Hammond first.
Set 233 min · 7 games · newest first
5-1
game 7
C. Chavarria serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
5-1
game 6
Z. Hammond serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
4-1
game 5
C. Chavarria serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
3-1
game 4
Z. Hammond serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-1
game 3
C. Chavarria serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-1
game 2
Z. Hammond serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-1
game 1
C. Chavarria serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
Set 139 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
Z. Hammond serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
5-2
game 7
C. Chavarria serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
4-2
game 6
Z. Hammond serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
4-1
game 5
C. Chavarria serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
3-1
game 4
Z. Hammond serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
2-1
game 3
C. Chavarria serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-1
game 2
Z. Hammond serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
0-1
game 1
C. Chavarria serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
Point chips read Z. Hammond first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
Z. HammondC. Chavarria
50%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Very evenly matched
How the model did
Predicted C. Chavarria
— wrong