← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| F. Ribero | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| J. Ficovich | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Villa Maria, Argentina
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 32
Surface
clay
Court
Cancha Central
City
Villa Maria
First serve
J. Ficovich
Total games
3–12
F. Ribero · match stats · J. Ficovich
0Aces6
1Double faults3
68%First serve in60%
58%First-serve points won77%
94%Second serve in85%
33%Second-serve points won60%
56%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted44%
30%Return points won50%
28Service points won35
15Receiver points won28
43Total points won63
3Games won12
3Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak6
1Longest game streak6
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 0–4 | 1–2 |
| Set 2 | 0–2 | 0–1 |
Figures read F. Ribero first.
Set 237 min · 6 games · newest first
0-5
game 6
J. Ficovich serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-5
game 5
F. Ribero serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-4
game 4
J. Ficovich serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-3
game 3
F. Ribero serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
0-2
game 2
J. Ficovich serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
0-1
game 1
F. Ribero serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
Set 139 min · 9 games · newest first
3-6
game 9
J. Ficovich serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
3-5
game 8
F. Ribero serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
2-5
game 7
J. Ficovich serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
2-4
game 6
F. Ribero serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
1-4
game 5
J. Ficovich serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-3
game 4
F. Ribero serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-3
game 3
J. Ficovich serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
0-2
game 2
F. Ribero serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
J. Ficovich serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
Point chips read F. Ribero first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
F. RiberoJ. Ficovich
81%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+130 places)
- Dominant on this surface (52% win rate)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted J. Ficovich
— correct