← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Wassermann | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| O. Prihodko | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Trnava Men 05
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
TC Empire Trnava - Court 5
City
Trnava
First serve
O. Prihodko
Total games
3–12
Recent form
M. Wassermann · match stats · O. Prihodko
2Aces7
1Double faults2
46%First serve in60%
50%First-serve points won85%
96%Second serve in88%
42%Second-serve points won71%
33%Break points saved100%
0%Break points converted67%
21%Return points won54%
22Service points won34
9Receiver points won26
31Total points won60
3Games won12
3Service games won8
0Tiebreaks won0
3Longest point streak7
1Longest game streak4
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–3 | 0–0 |
| Set 2 | 1–3 | 1–2 |
Figures read M. Wassermann first.
Set 230 min · 7 games · newest first
1-5
game 7
O. Prihodko serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-5
game 6
M. Wassermann serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
40-A
1-4
game 5
O. Prihodko serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
1-3
game 4
M. Wassermann serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
0-3
game 3
O. Prihodko serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-2
game 2
M. Wassermann serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
O. Prihodko serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
Set 133 min · 8 games · newest first
2-6
game 8
M. Wassermann serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
2-5
game 7
O. Prihodko serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-4
game 6
M. Wassermann serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
2-3
game 5
O. Prihodko serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-2
game 4
M. Wassermann serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
1-2
game 3
O. Prihodko serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
1-1
game 2
M. Wassermann serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
0-1
game 1
O. Prihodko serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
Point chips read M. Wassermann first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. WassermannO. Prihodko
83%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Better ranking (+54 places)
- More effective serve
- Better recent form
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted O. Prihodko
— correct