← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. Romanova | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| E. Jurna | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
UTR PTT Carvoeiro Women +H 08
Category
Utr
Surface
hard
Court
Carvoeiro Clube de Tenis - 04. Court Carvoeiro
City
Carvoeiro
First serve
E. Jurna
Total games
12–4
L. Romanova · match stats · E. Jurna
5Aces0
3Double faults9
54%First serve in59%
65%First-serve points won42%
86%Second serve in47%
59%Second-serve points won24%
50%Break points saved14%
86%Break points converted50%
66%Return points won38%
30Service points won14
27Receiver points won18
57Total points won32
12Games won4
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
10Longest point streak4
4Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–0 | 2–5 |
| Set 2 | 4–0 | 1–4 |
Figures read L. Romanova first.
Set 234 min · 9 games · newest first
5-3
game 9
L. Romanova serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
5-3
game 8
E. Jurna serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
5-2
game 7
L. Romanova serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-2
game 6
E. Jurna serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
3-2
game 5
L. Romanova serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
2-2
game 4
E. Jurna serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
1-2
game 3
L. Romanova serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
30-40
1-1
game 2
E. Jurna serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
1-0
game 1
L. Romanova serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
Set 131 min · 7 games · newest first
6-1
game 7
E. Jurna serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
5-1
game 6
L. Romanova serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
4-1
game 5
E. Jurna serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
A-40
3-1
game 4
L. Romanova serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
3-0
game 3
E. Jurna serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
2-0
game 2
L. Romanova serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
1-0
game 1
E. Jurna serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
Point chips read L. Romanova first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
L. RomanovaE. Jurna
52%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Very evenly matched
How the model did
Predicted E. Jurna
— wrong