← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Imamura | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| T. Daniel | 6 | 6 | 2 |
Match facts
Tournament
Matsuyama, Japan
Category
Challenger
Round
Round of 32
Surface
hard
Court
Center Court
City
Matsuyama
First serve
M. Imamura
Total games
4–12
Recent form
M. Imamura · match stats · T. Daniel
2Aces6
1Double faults0
67%First serve in57%
39%First-serve points won61%
95%Second serve in100%
42%Second-serve points won57%
50%Break points saved60%
40%Break points converted50%
41%Return points won60%
23Service points won29
20Receiver points won34
43Total points won63
4Games won12
2Service games won6
0Tiebreaks won0
5Longest point streak4
2Longest game streak7
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 2–3 | 1–0 |
| Set 2 | 0–3 | 0–0 |
Figures read M. Imamura first.
Set 233 min · 6 games · newest first
0-5
game 6
T. Daniel serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-5
game 5
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-4
game 4
T. Daniel serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
0-3
game 3
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
30-40
0-2
game 2
T. Daniel serving
15-0
15-15
15-30
15-40
30-40
0-1
game 1
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
40-40
A-40
40-40
A-40
40-40
40-A
Set 139 min · 10 games · newest first
4-6
game 10
T. Daniel serving
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
40-30
40-40
40-A
4-5
game 9
M. Imamura serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
40-30
3-5
game 8
T. Daniel serving
0-15
15-15
15-30
15-40
3-4
game 7
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
3-3
game 6
T. Daniel serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
2-3
game 5
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
2-2
game 4
T. Daniel serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
15-30
30-30
40-30
1-2
game 3
M. Imamura serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-2
game 2
T. Daniel serving
0-15
0-30
15-30
15-40
0-1
game 1
M. Imamura serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
Point chips read M. Imamura first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. ImamuraT. Daniel
58%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Ranked far higher (+259 places)
- More effective serve
- Better on break points
How the model did
Predicted T. Daniel
— correct