← All tennis
Set by set
| Player | Set 1 | Set 2 | Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| M. Andreeva | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| D. Shnaider | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Match facts
Tournament
WTA Finals
Category
Other
Surface
hard
Court
Stadium 2
City
Indian Wells
First serve
D. Shnaider
Total games
12–3
Recent form
M. Andreeva · match stats · D. Shnaider
1Aces0
2Double faults4
71%First serve in66%
72%First-serve points won45%
83%Second serve in73%
58%Second-serve points won20%
67%Break points saved14%
86%Break points converted33%
64%Return points won32%
28Service points won16
28Receiver points won13
56Total points won29
12Games won3
6Service games won2
0Tiebreaks won0
8Longest point streak4
6Longest game streak2
Per set · aces & double faults
| Set | Aces | Double faults |
|---|---|---|
| Set 1 | 1–0 | 2–1 |
| Set 2 | 0–0 | 0–1 |
Figures read M. Andreeva first.
Set 225 min · 7 games · newest first
5-1
game 7
D. Shnaider serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
5-1
game 6
M. Andreeva serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
4-1
game 5
D. Shnaider serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
40-15
40-30
3-1
game 4
M. Andreeva serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
2-1
game 3
D. Shnaider serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
40-15
1-1
game 2
M. Andreeva serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
40-15
0-1
game 1
D. Shnaider serving
0-15
0-30
0-40
15-40
30-40
Set 129 min · 8 games · newest first
6-2
game 8
M. Andreeva serving
15-0
30-0
40-0
40-15
5-2
game 7
D. Shnaider serving
BREAK
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
4-2
game 6
M. Andreeva serving
15-0
15-15
30-15
30-30
40-30
3-2
game 5
D. Shnaider serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
40-0
2-2
game 4
M. Andreeva serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
A-40
1-2
game 3
D. Shnaider serving
BREAK
0-15
0-30
15-30
30-30
40-30
0-2
game 2
M. Andreeva serving
BREAK
15-0
30-0
30-15
30-30
30-40
40-40
40-A
0-1
game 1
D. Shnaider serving
0-15
15-15
30-15
30-30
30-40
Point chips read M. Andreeva first · highlighted border marks the point winner.
Win probability
M. AndreevaD. Shnaider
77%
Model confidence
Why the model thinks so
- Dominant on this surface (75% win rate)
- More effective serve
- More titles on this surface
- Strong in tiebreaks (71%)
How the model did
Predicted M. Andreeva
— correct