Ranking trend
best #123Career record
60 matches30–30
Win–loss
46%
Hard · 6–7
49%
Clay · 19–20
57%
Grass · 4–3
2025
69 matches · 43–26 · 62.3%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 6 | 4 | — | 24 | 9 | 72% | 43% | — | — | 2–2 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 7 | 3 | — | 25 | 9 | 63% | 38% | — | — | 2–2 |
| Red Clay | 56 | 36 | 3 | 91 | 81 | 65% | 43% | — | — | 4–4 |
2024
63 matches · 36–27 · 57.1%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 7 | 4 | — | 37 | 16 | 70% | 43% | — | — | 1–2 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 11 | 6 | — | 53 | 20 | 72% | 45% | — | — | 2–4 |
| Red Clay | 45 | 26 | 1 | 103 | 78 | 67% | 45% | — | — | 8–3 |
2023
15 matches · 8–7 · 53.3%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 5 | 4 | — | 22 | 8 | 67% | 32% | 82 | 95 | 4–2 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 4 | 1 | — | 6 | 14 | 64% | 53% | 3 | 3 | — |
| Red Clay | 6 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 54% | 41% | 2 | 1 | 1–0 |
M = matches · W = wins · DF = double faults · BP conv. = break points converted · UE = unforced errors · TB = tiebreaks won–lost.
FT
Montreal
hard
7
6
6
2
2
0
FT
Zug, Switzerland
clay
6
4
4
6
6
1
2
1
FT
ATP Challenger Bunschoten, Netherlands Men Singles
clay
4
6
4
6
0
2
FT
Iasi, Romania
clay
6
4
5
7
6
7
1
2
FT
Wimbledon, Men
grass
4
6
6
4
7
6
0
6
6
2
3
2
FT
Wimbledon, Men
grass
4
6
6
3
1
6
1
2
FT
Wimbledon, Men
grass
6
7
3
6
0
2
FT
Nottingham 2, Great Britain
grass
3
6
6
2
3
6
1
2
FT
Bratislava, Slovakia
clay
6
4
6
4
2
0
FT
Roland Garros
clay
6
2
6
7
6
2
2
1
FT
Roland Garros
clay
4
6
6
1
3
6
1
2
FT
ATP Rome Masters
clay
6
3
3
6
7
6
2
1
FT
ATP Rome Masters
clay
3
6
4
6
0
2
FT
ATP Madrid Masters
clay
6
3
7
5
2
0
FT
Miami
hard
7
5
6
4
2
0
FT
Miami
hard
3
6
6
7
0
2
FT
Miami
hard
3
6
2
6
0
2
23:10
Indian Wells
hard
–
–
FT
Santiago
clay
7
5
6
3
2
0
FT
Rio de Janeiro
clay
6
7
5
7
0
2