Ranking trend
best #353Career record
28 matches10–18
Win–loss
33%
Hard · 4–8
40%
Clay · 6–9
0%
Grass · 0–1
2025
59 matches · 27–32 · 45.8%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 1 | 0 | — | 14 | 8 | 74% | 33% | — | — | — |
| Hardcourt Indoor | 11 | 5 | — | 34 | 33 | 66% | 31% | — | — | — |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 3 | 0 | — | 14 | 15 | 61% | 25% | — | — | — |
| Red Clay | 42 | 21 | 1 | 109 | 143 | 67% | 39% | — | — | 1–3 |
| red_clay_indoor | 2 | 1 | — | 8 | 4 | 72% | 37% | — | — | — |
2024
55 matches · 23–32 · 41.8%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardcourt Indoor | 15 | 5 | — | 76 | 47 | 68% | 29% | — | — | 0–4 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 11 | 6 | 1 | 30 | 42 | 69% | 44% | — | — | 1–3 |
| Red Clay | 28 | 12 | — | 65 | 105 | 64% | 38% | — | — | 5–3 |
| red_clay_indoor | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 | 26% | — | — | — | — |
2023
8 matches · 2–6 · 25.0%| Surface | M | W | Titles | Aces | DF | 1st serve | BP conv. | Winners | UE | TB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grass | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 3 | 42% | 0% | — | — | — |
| Hardcourt Indoor | 2 | 0 | — | 10 | 5 | 67% | 33% | — | — | 1–1 |
| Hardcourt Outdoor | 2 | 0 | — | 13 | 7 | 57% | 15% | — | — | — |
| Red Clay | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 11 | 71% | 42% | — | — | — |
M = matches · W = wins · DF = double faults · BP conv. = break points converted · UE = unforced errors · TB = tiebreaks won–lost.
FT
Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland
hard
6
2
6
4
2
0
FT
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles
clay
7
6
1
0
1
0
FT
Troyes, France
clay
7
6
3
6
2
6
1
2
FT
ATP Challenger Plovdiv, Bulgaria Men Singles
clay
2
6
1
6
0
2
FT
ATP Challenger Royan, France Men Singles
clay
2
6
6
3
6
3
2
1
FT
Lyon, France
clay
3
6
0
6
0
2
FT
Montpellier
hard
6
3
3
6
6
7
1
2
FT
Manama, Bahrain
hard
6
3
6
3
2
0
FT
Auckland
hard
6
3
6
4
2
0
FT
Maia, Portugal
clay
6
1
3
6
2
6
1
2
FT
Maia, Portugal
clay
6
2
6
1
2
0
FT
Helsinki, Finland
hard
5
7
6
1
6
3
2
1
FT
Helsinki, Finland
hard
6
3
6
4
2
0
FT
Helsinki, Finland
hard
6
1
6
3
2
0
FT
Brest, France
hard
3
6
2
6
0
2
FT
Mouilleron-Le-Captif, France
hard
6
2
3
1
1
0
FT
Mouilleron-Le-Captif, France
hard
3
6
6
3
6
2
2
1
—
Mouilleron-Le-Captif, France
hard
–
–
FT
Szczecin, Poland
clay
7
6
3
6
0
6
1
2
FT
Szczecin, Poland
clay
4
6
2
6
0
2