Growing Discord community — direct access to the developer, live coverage & picks. Join the Discord Join now →
Tournaments Rankings Matches Predictions ⚡ Get the Sports Addon

Tennis Predictions

Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.

142Upcoming
65.1%Accuracy
14064Settled
Bastad, Sweden clay ✓ Correct High · 77%
M. Matoula
vs
Y. Putintseva
23%
77%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 62%
J. Grabher
vs
R. Masarova
38%
62%
1–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
T. Huang
vs
S. Purtseladze
44%
56%
2–1
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 73%
D. Kuzmanov
vs
R. Strombachs
73%
27%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Low · 50%
A. Chepelev
vs
D. Yevseyev
50%
50%
2–1
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 60%
A. Hesse
vs
B. Palicova
60%
40%
2–0
Bastad, Sweden clay ✗ Missed Medium · 57%
L. Romero Gormaz
vs
D. Semenistaja
43%
57%
2–1
Trieste, Italy clay ✗ Missed Low · 55%
A. Martin
vs
H. Bernet
55%
45%
0–2
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Low · 54%
L. Raquillet
vs
F. Ribero
54%
46%
2–1
Iasi, Romania clay ✓ Correct High · 86%
M. Erhard
vs
N. K. Sinha
86%
14%
2–0
Iasi, Romania clay ✗ Missed Low · 51%
M. Zormann
vs
S D P. Dev
51%
49%
0–2
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Low · 51%
A. Lew Yan Foon
vs
D. Martynov
49%
51%
1–2
Iasi, Romania clay ✗ Missed High · 78%
A. Marti Pujolras
vs
S. Hamza Reguig
78%
22%
1–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✗ Missed Medium · 63%
R. Seggerman
vs
P. Brady
63%
37%
0–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✓ Correct Low · 54%
J. Delaney
vs
M. Walters
46%
54%
1–2
ATP Challenger Nottingham 3, Great Britain Men Singles grass ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
T. Papamalamis
vs
W. Jansen
56%
44%
1–2
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct Medium · 55%
L. Potenza
vs
P. O. Fellin
45%
55%
1–2
Wimbledon, Women grass ✓ Correct High · 73%
A. Krueger
vs
M. Kostyuk
27%
73%
0–2
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 72%
N. Gombos
vs
O. Luz
72%
28%
2–0
Trieste, Italy clay ✓ Correct High · 76%
E. Dalla Valle
vs
I. Carou
76%
24%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct High · 79%
T. Wild
vs
V. Marysko
79%
21%
2–0
Braunschweig, Germany clay ✓ Correct Medium · 55%
S. Pieri
vs
R. Molleker
45%
55%
1–2
Bastad, Sweden clay ✗ Missed High · 70%
O. Oliynykova
vs
M. Uchijima
70%
30%
1–2
Bastad, Sweden clay ✗ Missed Medium · 56%
N. Noha Akugue
vs
I. Burillo
56%
44%
1–2
Bastad, Sweden clay ✓ Correct High · 66%
M. Bulgaru
vs
V. Strakhova
66%
34%
2–0
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 58%
A. Monnot
vs
M. S. Popa
58%
42%
2–0
Contrexeville, France clay ✓ Correct Medium · 63%
A. Herrero Linana
vs
L. Nguyen Tan
63%
37%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Medium · 61%
R. Nijboer
vs
K. Rahmani
61%
39%
2–0
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✗ Missed Medium · 55%
G. Campana Lee
vs
M. De Krom
45%
55%
2–1
ATP Challenger Liege, Belgium Men Singles clay ✓ Correct Low · 50%
L. Staeheli
vs
F. Lechno-Wasiutynski
50%
50%
1–0
⚡ This page, via API Pro

Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):

GET /tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
Tennis API docs →

How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.