Tennis Predictions
Model win probabilities for ATP & WTA matches, with a confidence rating per pick and a public accuracy record over every settled match.
236Upcoming
65.1%Accuracy
13352Settled
Biella, Italy Men Singles
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 58%
vs
2–1
Guangzhou, China
hard
✗ Missed
Medium · 64%
vs
2–1
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 61%
vs
0–2
Valencia, Spain
clay
✓ Correct
Low · 52%
vs
1–2
Rennes, France
hard
✓ Correct
High · 75%
vs
2–0
Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
hard
✓ Correct
Medium · 55%
vs
2–0
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✓ Correct
High · 65%
vs
1–2
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✗ Missed
High · 70%
vs
0–2
Rennes, France
hard
✓ Correct
High · 70%
vs
1–0
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✗ Missed
Low · 52%
vs
1–2
Biella, Italy Men Singles
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 59%
vs
2–0
Guangzhou, China
hard
✓ Correct
Medium · 65%
vs
2–0
Rennes, France
hard
✓ Correct
High · 78%
vs
0–2
Valencia, Spain
clay
✗ Missed
Low · 52%
vs
1–2
Rennes, France
hard
✗ Missed
Medium · 64%
vs
0–2
Guangzhou, China
hard
✓ Correct
High · 78%
vs
0–2
Biella, Italy Men Singles
clay
✗ Missed
Low · 52%
vs
2–0
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 55%
vs
2–0
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✗ Missed
Low · 52%
vs
0–2
Biella, Italy Men Singles
clay
✓ Correct
Medium · 55%
vs
0–2
Ljubljana, Slovenia
clay
✓ Correct
High · 70%
vs
2–0
Guangzhou, China
hard
✗ Missed
Medium · 62%
vs
2–0
Guangzhou, China
hard
✗ Missed
Medium · 55%
vs
0–2
Guangzhou, China
hard
✗ Missed
High · 80%
vs
1–1
Guangzhou, China
hard
✓ Correct
High · 69%
vs
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam
hard
✓ Correct
Low · 53%
vs
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam
hard
✓ Correct
Low · 53%
vs
2–1
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam
hard
✓ Correct
Medium · 57%
vs
2–0
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam
hard
✓ Correct
Low · 51%
vs
1–2
Phan Thiet 4, Vietnam
hard
✗ Missed
High · 69%
vs
2–1
⚡ This page, via API Pro
Everything on this page is available as JSON via the Tennis API (Sports Addon, $5/mo):
GET
/tennis/api/v2/predictions/?upcoming=true
How to read this: the bar shows our model's win probability for each player; the confidence pill rates how much signal the model had for this match-up. Accuracy is measured over every settled prediction — not a curated subset. Not betting advice; no outcome is guaranteed.